I have to be honest in saying that I'd probably be angry if I were Annette in 2006 as well.
First, the whole gold versus no gold thing. Collectors FREAKED that year. I'm not talking mild discussions about the whole thing. I'm talking FREAKED OUT. Now, in hindsight a lot of those people went back on their decision and bought gold dolls. Some didn't. Personally, I bought one of each. And everyone who has the gold remarks on how subtle it is. But, at the time, people were angry and upset and sad and emailing and talking and complaining and, well, I think it would have hurt my feelings, too, if I had been standing in Annette's shoes. BUT, to her credit, she adjusted her vision to better appeal to the collectors. So, control issues, yes. But not when it comes to her collectors. There, she is willing to compromise.
I do think, however, her attitude towards collectors is VERY different than that with employees and dealers. Many dealers depended on Annette's dolls for MANY years. She knew she could push them and get away with it, and I daresay that few on this forum would have acted any differently. What we put up with and do at work can sometimes be very different from what we put up with and do in our personal lives. And, I'm as guilty as anyone about knowing which people I can push a little to make my life easier in my professional life.
And then, there is the whole "touchy feely" thing. I'm not all warm and fuzzy and I think people who act this way are totally fake. Except Elisabeth. She IS warm and fuzzy with strawberries and whipped cream on top. But, that aside, I definitely feel Annette is not the warm and fuzzy type. Her father died when she was young and she blacked out the years after his death. Why? Well, duh. Traumatic childhood experience. And this tells me she can distance herself from herself so it is very likely she would distance herself from other people. And, to be even more honest, I don't think she is fun to work with. But, brilliant people are generally not "people people". They are so much in their own heads and in their own work that they don't really know how to relate with people or to relate to people beyond their own frame of reference and experiences.
As for the "control freak", well, if I invested my life and millions of dollars into a factory, believe me, I'd be a control freak. But, I wouldn't read every email that came into the company, because I wouldn't understand it. It would need to be translated and for that an element of freedom would need to be given to the employees. Saying that, however, I personally received a letter from Annette apologizing for Wanipanda. I knew she wrote it because there were grammar mistakes and she signed it. I am 110% positive that she was completely unaware of the first time Wanipanda was sent back. But she was made aware only the second time after I complained and after Ulrike talked to her about it. To be honest, I received the impression that the staff don't talk to Annette about much at all unless they absolutely must. This was when Ulrike indicated that she had a "good relationship" with Annette because she had worked there a long time. This means that some employees don't and it is very likely they tell her nothing.
The factory closure - that was Annette's decision. The green dot issue and how it was dealt with? I think that was most likely a bit more complex. It was too messy to be highly controlled (which is more Annette's style) and I don't think it was as simple as Annette telling the repair department what to do. I think the repair department flew solo wth that for awhile. And they bungled it up. And the results, although not released publicly, likely proved that employees bungled up the vinyl pouring just as they bungled up porcelain production in 2005.
I think the factory shut down has to do with control. She couldn't control the out of control quality issues. When employees can't do their jobs and create hundreds of thousands of dollars in repair costs, well, there really isn't any point to having the business in that form. Something has to change.
But only my view. To each his/her own.