A doll's skintone is irrelevant to me as well, Jann, when it comes to what I love or not love, but when a doll is supposed to represent a particular ethnicity I do like it to be somewhat comparable. Wanipanda's complexion is nowhere nearly as dark as it should be, but it's not white either, and I can accept that.
I respect the artistic element of the Asian dolls from 2005, but I don't like what they represent. I think it is hard to explain this to someone who has never lived outside of a multi-ethnic society, but I will try. EVERYONE here is Japanese or Asian except for perhaps five percent of the population. But who are the models in magazines? White girls with blonde or brown hair. Why is that? Well, European and American standards of beauty aren't limited to those areas. It is changing very slowly, but I cannot say how many times I have heard the expression "I like your skin". It's very unnerving since it is coming from gorgeous women who feel that to be beautiful they need to be white.
What bothers me about Ai Lien and Mithi is not so much their complexion, but the perpetuation of the "myth" that Asian people have and should have white skin. This is simply not true. In four years, and across Japan, I have NEVER seen an Asian child with a complexion of Mithi, Ai Lien or Kiomi. I have seen a complexion as light as Kindra's and as dark as Tscharle's, so I am very glad this misconception was corrected by Annette in the 2008 collection. Frankly, it isn't that Mithi, Ai Lien and Kiomi are ugly. They are very beautiful, but they are "unnatural" to my eye, because I'm expecting to see "Asian".
At the same time, I don't like the redheads from 2004 either for the very same reason. Few natural redheads can tan like that, and I think it's a bit unnatural for little redheaded girls to have such dark complexions. I love a lot of the 2004 sculpts, but I can't handle that vinyl color.